In the article “Advancing
Sustainable Infrastructure with Envision”, Nelson (2015) shared that Envision
is a holistic rating system which acts as a global reference for every form of
infrastructure. Nelson further stated that Envision offers a triple bottom line
approach which are people, profit and planet. It promotes end to end
documentation from the design phase to the completion phase which covers the
entire cycle of the project. In addition, Envision focuses on 5 aspects which
are Quality of Life (QL), Leadership (LD), Resource Allocation (RA), Climate
and Risk (CR) and Natural World (NW). These 5 aspects are used as benchmark to
grade each project. However, while Envision is able to provide comprehensive
approaches towards sustainability, there are limitations to what the Envision
rating system can offer. Therefore, organizations should be aware of the
limitations of incorporating Envision.
The following is a case study of a
project awarded with Envision, Gold. The first company to achieve an Envision
award was the “William Jack Hernandez Sport Fish Hatchery”. The William Jack
Hernandez Sport Fish Hatchery brochure states that due to the sustainable
designs, they achieved a 95% reduction in water usage as only 5% of water is
required to be heated. Therefore, by using Envision, William Jack Hernandez
Sport Fish Hatchery reduced their operation cost through consumption of less energy
and resources. The brochure further
states that by using Envision, the company helps to contribute to the economy
as more jobs are created. The safety
features of their facilities are enhanced. There is also the reduction in
reactive maintenance as the system provides a stringent process of monitoring
the health of the equipment.
With the Envision systems in place,
unexpected breakdowns and loss of manpower hours would be minimized. In
addition, by ensuring a safe environment, there would be an increase in
workers’ productivity and visitors’ learning experience would be enhanced
(Haberman, 2013).
Furthermore, organizations have
looked towards Envision for economic advantages. Tanyu (as mentioned in Hardin,
2015) mentioned that we should consider the benefits of using sustainable designs
and not merely focus on the initial costs as such approach would benefit the
company economically over the long term. Hence, organizations ought to start
using sustainable designs to reap the benefits and they will reap cost savings
in the long run.
However, there are limitations to
what Envision can offer. In the design phase of every project, there are many considerations
such as climate change, physical constraints, maintenance, etc. According to
Nicholas Bishop (as mentioned in Hardin, 2015), Envision would need to find
ways to manage retrofitting systems, reconfiguring structures and find the best
practices for deconstructing. This would enable projects to further reduce
operation and maintenance costs and improve sustainability.
In conclusion, I believe that Envision
is a reliable tool which aids engineers to progressively track and monitor
their projects. Moreover, projects that incorporate Envision in their designs help
to improve sustainability which benefits the environment and aid the economy by
creating jobs. However, it has its limitations as well and companies should
look into separate processes where Envision is lacking, for example,
retrofitting, to ensure efficiency to their operations.
References
Nelson, D. (2015,
June). Advancing Sustainable Infrastructure with Envision. Civil + structural Engineer. Retrieved from http://cenews.com/article/10098/advancing-sustainable-infrastructure-with-envision
Hardin, W. (2015,
January 13). Can a Rating System Ensure Infrastructure Sustainability? Building and Construction. Retrieved
from
http://www.insights.globalspec.com/article/349/can-a-rating-system-ensure-infrastructure-sustainability
William Jack Hernandez
Sport Fish Hatchery. (n.d.). William jack
Hernandez sport fish hatchery [Brochure]. Retrieved from
http://www.hdrinc.com/sites/all/files/assets/
knowledge-center/wjh-sport-fish-hatchery-brochure.pdf
Haberman, M. (2013). A
Safe Environment Is a Productive Environment: Ensuring Workplace Safety and
Security. Retrieved from http://omegahrsolutions.com/2013/12/4562.html
Additional Bibliography
Institute For
Sustainable Infrastructure (ISI): Rating System. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://www.sustainableinfrastructure.ord/rating/